Water sanitation and hygiene, popularly known as WASH, constitutes a critical sector in the national quest for sustainable development.
The sector, however, remains threatened by the brutish impacts of climate change, especially as they relate to water and its complex interactions with sanitation and hygiene services.
The challenge of climate change for the WASH sector has become increasingly evident as many communities across the country continue to experience the discomfort of changing climate conditions and their consequential impacts on water resources.
The continuing manifestation of climate change impacts and its negative influences on WASH service provision have therefore emerged as a critical policy concern for urgent intervention action.
This is even more so because, as Ghana continues to roll out key climate change mitigation and adaptation policies, water remains a central concern and has rightly been labelled as a key climate-sensitive sector.
While the water sector has attracted the needed policy attention, that level of attention is yet to be given to the implications of water (availability or not) for the efficient and effective deployment of WASH services across Ghana.
This is against the backdrop of the existence of a ministry responsible for water resources and sanitation, and the fact that there has been some mention of WASH in some policy documents. These mentions, however, are only made in passing, as subtexts, for the most part, to confirm the seeming lack of attention to the WASH sector as a critical policy concern.
WASH and National Climate Adaptation Planning (NAP)
Ghana is currently involved in National Adaptation Planning, known as NAP, and a major policy commitment to the international climate action agenda. As part of the NAP processes, the government is using various approaches to develop a national plan to guide adaptation needs in key sectors and in diverse regions across the country.
Even though the NAP process is being implemented at the national level, it also has a special focus on subnational governance structures, which aim at ensuring that municipal and district assemblies across the country develop the requisite capacities to lead the development of district-specific adaptation plans.
The NAP process is also expected to develop sector-specific adaptation plans. These sectors are carefully chosen as prioritized sectors based on their critical importance to the national economy, contributions to the achievements of the SDGs, and their levels of exposure and vulnerability to climate change impacts.
Water, undoubtedly, is one such sector in the plan, with its inclusion affirming its place and value to the national economy and sustainable development processes. A key component of the NAP process is the need to conduct climate risk and vulnerability assessments in all districts and in all the identified key sectors.
And, indeed, any effective adaptation planning process will have to be anchored on rigorous climate risk and vulnerability assessments.
The good news is that the current NAP process is doing all these things and doing them right to create an inclusive and well-considered adaptation plan to guide resilience and adaptive capacity building across the country. What is missing, however, is the lack of focus on the inextricable linkage that exists between water, sanitation, hygiene, and climate.
WASH, as a sector, is not centralized as part of current adaptation planning processes, even though climate impacts on water have attracted significant attention.
Such an omission is worrying even though it is not entirely new nor surprising; it only goes to affirm how issues of WASH are treated largely as afterthoughts and given low treatments in policy considerations. It is also not surprising because not many understand the climate change phenomenon to appreciate the complex manifestation of impacts through water and what that means for WASH services provision.
Integrating WASH Considerations in Climate Policies in Ghana
The current policy environment and the goodwill to create an all-inclusive climate adaptation plan for the country possibly present an opportunity for proactive consideration and integration of WASH-related issues in policy decisions.
Thankfully, the NAP process is still ongoing and has every opportunity to centralize issues of WASH in the process. This, as has been indicated, should involve the conduct of WASH climate risk assessments in all the districts to inform the development of district-specific climate-resilient WASH adaptation plans.
It is interesting to note that WaterAid Ghana, as a leading WASH advocate in Ghana, has even before the NAP process independently initiated climate risk and vulnerability assessments in the water sector in their operational regions in Ghana to facilitate understanding of current and future risks and vulnerabilities and what that means for WASH service provision.
Such an initiative is not only encouraging but also instructive. The dependency of the WASH sector on water resources and the centrality of WASH services make it critically imperative that such proactive actions, as demonstrated by WaterAid Ghana, become status quo practices to inform policy decisions on WASH.
While the NAP is only one of such policies, there is also the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), which serve as one major policy avenue that highlights Ghana’s climate action efforts and how that contributes to internationally agreed ambitions.
If for nothing else, the NDCs, NAPS, and Ghana’s different climate change and sustainable development policies and strategies, must be seen as projecting the importance of WASH as a critical and climate-sensitive sector, which requires an enabling and proactive policy environment to support WASH service provision.
Source: Citinewsroom.com
Writer: Bob Manteaw, PhD, Senior Research Fellow, Climate Resilience and Sustainable Development, Center for Climate Change and Sustainability Studies, University of Ghana
